Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more

Christian Texts and History • Re: Carrier proposes the NT Jesus based on Philo’s Jesus ang

By Bernard Muller to Giuseppe,2) therefore he concludes that that Jewish guy is an allegory of the Logos (exactly as Melchisedec).I cannot see how you can deduct that from Philo. That’s certainly not what Philo wrote:”“Behold, the man named Rises!” is a very novel appellation indeed, if you consider it as spoken of …read more